Comments on: Where We Stand: Part 1 - Catcher’s Roles http://catchersblog.com/archives/39 A Braves blog by a huge Braves fan. Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:11:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Corey Bishop http://catchersblog.com/archives/39#comment-42 Corey Bishop Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:51:49 +0000 http://catchersblog.bravetragedy.net/archives/39#comment-42 Yeah I agree, and I'm happy with either Lopez or Sammons. Yeah I agree, and I’m happy with either Lopez or Sammons.

]]> By: Leah http://catchersblog.com/archives/39#comment-41 Leah Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:54:02 +0000 http://catchersblog.bravetragedy.net/archives/39#comment-41 Basically what I was saying. Lopez will probably get it if he performs well, if not then Sammons most likely will. I don't look for Pena to get it either. But we'll have to see what happens, I guess. Basically what I was saying. Lopez will probably get it if he performs well, if not then Sammons most likely will. I don’t look for Pena to get it either. But we’ll have to see what happens, I guess.

]]> By: Corey Bishop http://catchersblog.com/archives/39#comment-40 Corey Bishop Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:22:06 +0000 http://catchersblog.bravetragedy.net/archives/39#comment-40 Nice. Here's a summary of what my article would look like. Clint Sammons: Really good, but needs to develop more. Pena: Sucks at defense. Not the guy for backup role. Miller: Just plain sucks. Not thanks. Lopez: If he performs well in Spring Training, he's your man. He's a low risk guy, so why not? Nice. Here’s a summary of what my article would look like.

Clint Sammons: Really good, but needs to develop more.

Pena: Sucks at defense. Not the guy for backup role.

Miller: Just plain sucks. Not thanks.

Lopez: If he performs well in Spring Training, he’s your man. He’s a low risk guy, so why not?

]]>